The ACA subsidy debate’s impact on your practice and clients

If you’ve been following the news, you’ve probably heard about the government shutdown and the heated debates in Congress. At the heart of it all? ACA subsidies. These subsidies are a lifeline for millions of Americans—and they’re also a big deal for clinicians, therapists, and the clients you serve. Let’s break it all down and talk about what this means for you and your practice. 

ACA subsidies at the center of the shutdown 

First, a quick refresher: a government shutdown happens when Congress can’t agree on a funding bill. This time, the sticking point is the Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies. Democrats are pushing to extend the enhanced subsidies that were introduced in 2021, while Republicans are resisting, citing concerns about costs and healthcare for immigrants. 

Here’s why this matters: ACA subsidies help make health insurance more affordable by capping how much people pay out of pocket. In 2021, the Biden administration expanded these subsidies, making them more generous and accessible. But those enhancements are set to expire at the end of the year, and if Congress doesn’t act, millions of Americans could see their premiums skyrocket—or lose their coverage altogether. 

Why ACA subsidies matter so much 

Let’s talk numbers. Right now, about 24.3 million Americans are enrolled in ACA plans, and 22.4 million of them rely on subsidies to afford their coverage. If the enhanced subsidies expire, the average out-of-pocket premium could more than double—from $888 to $1,904 a year. That’s a huge jump, and it could leave 4.2 million more people uninsured. 

For your clients, this could mean tough choices about whether to keep their coverage. For your practice, it could mean more clients struggling to pay for services—or skipping care altogether. 

The debate over healthcare for immigrants 

You’ve probably heard arguments about how this is all tied to healthcare for immigrants. Let’s untangle what’s really going on behind the headlines. First, under federal law—specifically the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA)—hospitals have to provide emergency care to everyone who walks in their doors, no matter their immigration status or ability to pay. This includes immigrants without legal status, and it’s not optional. If someone needs care in an emergency, they’re going to get it. 

Where things get complicated is determining who foots the bill. Democrats are pushing for hospitals to be reimbursed for these legally mandated services, using federal funds to help cover their costs. Republicans, on the other hand, don’t want to expand this type of federal reimbursement, and frame the issue as “free healthcare for illegal immigrants.” But labeling it that way misses the real challenge. The core question isn’t whether immigrants receive care—they already do, by law. It’s about who pays for it. 

Hospitals can’t turn people away, often absorbing huge care costs for uninsured and undocumented individuals. Over time, this financial strain can force hospitals, especially those serving vulnerable communities, to cut back services or face closure, affecting everyone in those areas. 

There’s another safety net some populations benefit from, called “presumptive Medicaid.” For instance, pregnant women and a few other groups can qualify for Medicaid coverage temporarily while they’re determined eligible; this helps hospitals recoup costs for some types of care. But this doesn’t cover every situation or every person, so hospitals are still left shouldering much of the financial burden. 

For clinicians and therapists, this debate has ripple effects beyond hospital walls. When hospitals and community health systems are stretched too thin, clients have a harder time accessing emergency and ongoing care. That means more community pressure on your clinic, more clients facing gaps in coverage, and extra challenges connecting people with the help they need. The bigger picture here is that how we address these reimbursement questions shapes the backbone of our entire care network, touching each of us as providers and each of our clients. 

Implications for your practice 

So, what does all of this mean for you as a clinician or practice owner? Here are a few key takeaways: 

• Rising costs for clients: If subsidies expire, many of your clients could face higher premiums, making it harder for them to afford care. 

• More uninsured clients: With millions potentially losing coverage, you may see an increase in clients who are uninsured or underinsured. 

• Financial strain on practices: As clients struggle to pay for services, your practice could feel ripple effects. 

Navigating this uncertainty 

While the situation is still unfolding, there are steps you can take to prepare and support your clients: 

1. Stay informed: Keep an eye on updates about ACA subsidies and government funding decisions. Knowledge is power. 
2. Advocate for your clients: Join professional organizations that are lobbying for sustainable healthcare funding. Your voice matters. 
3. Educate your clients: Help them understand how potential changes could impact their coverage and what options they have. 
4. Plan for financial changes: Review your practice’s financial plans and consider how to adapt if more clients face coverage challenges.
5. Collaborate with your community: Partner with local hospitals and organizations to address gaps in care and support clients in need.  

Facing this together 

The ACA subsidy debate is complex, and the stakes are high—for your clients, your practice, and the broader healthcare system. But you’re not alone in this. By staying informed, advocating for change, and supporting your clients, you can navigate this uncertainty and continue to make a difference in their lives. As for us, we will continue tracking and monitoring the situation, updating you as soon as we know more. Stay tuned! 

About the author